IVV vs SPY: fees, holdings and returns
IVV and SPY both track the S&P 500 and hold the same about 500 large US companies. IVV charges a lower yearly fee. SPY trades in far larger amounts each day. Over the same dates since May 2000, IVV returned about 8.6% a year and SPY returned about 8.5% a year.
Written by the Tactfolio research team. Fund facts checked October 16, 2026. Prices through October 20, 2026.
Key points
- IVV costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.0945%.
- IVV started trading in May 2000. SPY started in January 1993.
- Worst drops since 2000: IVV −55.3%, SPY −55.2%.
- Daily correlation: 0.99 (1 means they always move together).
What is the difference between IVV and SPY?#
The holdings are the same, so cost and structure set them apart. SPY started in 1993 as a unit investment trust, which holds dividends as cash until it pays them out and cannot lend out its shares. IVV is a regular fund from iShares that can put dividends to work right away. Over long holds the lower fee adds up in IVV’s favor, all else equal. SPY’s huge trading volume and options market matter most to big, active traders.
| Fact | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
| Issuer | iShares (BlackRock) | SPDR (State Street) |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% a year | 0.0945% a year |
| Started trading | May 15, 2000 | January 22, 1993 |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | S&P 500 Index |
| Holdings | 505 holdings as of October 15, 2026 | 504 holdings as of October 15, 2026 |
| Type | US stocks, ETF | US stocks, ETF |
Fund facts checked on the iShares (BlackRock) IVV page and the SPDR (State Street) SPY page.
Is IVV or SPY cheaper?#
IVV costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.0945%. On $10,000, that is about $3 a year for IVV and $9.45 for SPY. The fund takes its fee out of its own value a little each day, so you never get a bill.
IVV vs SPY performance over the same dates#
Both funds are measured from May 2000 to October 2026, the dates both traded. IVV returned about 8.6% a year and SPY returned about 8.5% a year. IVV came out ahead over this period, which does not mean it will again.
| Measure | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 grew to | $87,687 | $86,962 |
| Total return | 776.9% | 769.6% |
| Return per year (CAGR) | 8.6% | 8.5% |
| Worst drop from a high | −55.3% | −55.2% |
| Volatility (how much it swings) | 18.9% | 19.1% |
| Last 12 months | 15.8% | 15.8% |
| Last 3 years, per year | 23.8% | 23.7% |
| Last 5 years, per year | 12.8% | 12.7% |
| Last 10 years, per year | 15.5% | 15.5% |
Prices through October 20, 2026. Figures use daily closing prices adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They do not include taxes or the cost of buying and selling. Past results do not tell you what will happen next.
IVV and SPY returns by year#
| Year | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (part of the year) | 13.7% | 13.7% |
| 2025 | 17.8% | 17.7% |
| 2024 | 24.9% | 24.9% |
| 2023 | 26.3% | 26.2% |
| 2022 | −18.2% | −18.2% |
| 2021 | 28.8% | 28.7% |
| 2020 | 18.4% | 18.3% |
| 2019 | 31.3% | 31.2% |
| 2018 | −4.5% | −4.6% |
| 2017 | 21.8% | 21.7% |
| 2016 | 11.5% | 12.0% |
| 2015 | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| 2014 | 13.6% | 13.5% |
| 2013 | 32.3% | 32.3% |
| 2012 | 16.1% | 16.0% |
| 2011 | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| 2010 | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| 2009 | 26.6% | 26.4% |
| 2008 | −37.0% | −36.8% |
| 2007 | 5.3% | 5.1% |
| 2006 | 15.9% | 15.8% |
| 2005 | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| 2004 | 10.8% | 10.7% |
| 2003 | 28.5% | 28.2% |
| 2002 | −21.5% | −21.6% |
| 2001 | −12.0% | −11.8% |
| 2000 (part of the year) | −6.1% | −6.3% |
Which fell further in bad times?#
A drawdown is how far a fund falls from its last high point. IVV’s worst fall was −55.3%, from October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009. It got back to that high on August 16, 2012.
SPY’s worst fall was −55.2%, from October 9, 2007 to March 9, 2009. It got back to that high on August 16, 2012.
Their daily moves had a correlation of 0.99. A correlation of 1 means two funds always move up and down together. Near 0 means they move on their own. So holding both adds little variety.
Why people choose IVV or SPY#
IVV. Long-term investors often pick IVV for its lower yearly fee on the same index.
SPY. Traders often pick SPY because so much trades each day and its options market is the busiest of any fund.
Strategies that hold IVV or SPY#
These classic strategies hold one or both at least some of the time. Each is a set of written rules you can open, test and copy.
- Hybrid Asset Allocation (HAA), by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2023 (holds SPY)
- HAA Simple: Hybrid Asset Allocation with one asset, by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2023 (holds SPY)
- Bold Asset Allocation (BAA), by Wouter Keller, 2022 (holds SPY)
- Vigilant Asset Allocation (VAA), by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2017 (holds SPY)
- Defensive Asset Allocation (DAA), by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2018 (holds SPY)
- Protective Asset Allocation (PAA), by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2016 (holds SPY)
- Adaptive Asset Allocation (AAA), by Adam Butler, Michael Philbrick, Rodrigo Gordillo, and David Varadi, 2012 (holds SPY)
- Faber’s 10-month moving average timing model, by Mebane Faber, 2007 (holds SPY)
- Dual Momentum: Antonacci’s Global Equities Momentum (GEM), by Gary Antonacci, 2014 (holds SPY)
- Composite Dual Momentum, by Gary Antonacci, 2012 (holds SPY)
- Global Tactical Asset Allocation (GTAA 5), by Mebane Faber, 2007 (holds SPY)
- Vigilant Asset Allocation G12 (VAA-G12), by Wouter Keller and JW Keuning, 2017 (holds SPY)
- Bold Asset Allocation G4 (BAA aggressive), by Wouter Keller, 2022 (holds SPY)
- Ivy Portfolio rotation (Faber’s relative strength model), by Mebane Faber and Eric Richardson, 2009 (holds SPY)
- Faber sector rotation (the three strongest US sectors), by Mebane Faber, 2010 (holds SPY)
- Trinity Portfolio (Meb Faber), by Mebane Faber, 2016 (holds SPY)
- 12-Month High Switch (Meb Faber), by Mebane Faber, 2020 (holds SPY)
- US Cross-Asset Momentum (stock and Treasury timing), by Aleksi Pitkäjärvi, Matti Suominen, and Lauri Vaittinen, 2016 (holds SPY)
- US Risk Parity Trend-Following (The Trend is Our Friend), by Andrew Clare, James Seaton, Peter N. Smith, and Stephen Thomas, 2016 (holds SPY)
- Defense First (Carlson’s defensive tactical model), by Thomas D. Carlson, 2025 (holds SPY)
- HAA 60/40 (NLX Finance’s Hybrid Asset Allocation variant), by Nicolas Lequeux (NLX Finance), 2024 (holds SPY)
- Paired Switching (quarterly SPY and TLT rotation), by Akhilesh Maewal and Joel R. Bock, 2011 (holds SPY)
- Quint Switching Filtered (Lewis Glenn’s QSF), by Lewis A. Glenn, 2018 (holds SPY)
- Trending Fast and Slow (volatility-switched momentum), by Eddie Cheng, Nazar Kostyuchyk, Wai Lee, Pai Liu, and Chenfei Ma, 2022 (holds SPY)
- Accelerating Dual Momentum (ADM), by Engineered Portfolio (Steve Hanly), 2018 (holds SPY)
- Robust Asset Allocation Balanced (Alpha Architect RAA), by Wesley Gray (Alpha Architect), 2014 (holds SPY)
- Robust Asset Allocation Aggressive (Alpha Architect RAA), by Wesley Gray (Alpha Architect), 2014 (holds SPY)
- Tactical Permanent Portfolio (GestaltU / ReSolve), by Adam Butler, Michael Philbrick, and Rodrigo Gordillo, 2012 (holds SPY)
- Diversified Dual Momentum (Newfound Research), by Corey Hoffstein (Newfound Research), 2019 (holds SPY)
- Three-Way Model (Ned Davis Research), by Ned Davis Research, 2015 (holds SPY)
- Kipnis Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation (KDA), by Ilya Kipnis, 2019 (holds SPY)
- Ivy Portfolio (Faber and Richardson, buy and hold), by Mebane Faber and Eric Richardson, 2009 (holds SPY)
- 60/40 Portfolio (classic stocks and bonds), by Traditional balanced funds (holds SPY)
- Leverage Rotation Strategy (UPRO above the 200-day average), by Michael Gayed and Charles Bilello, 2016 (holds SPY)
- Leverage Rotation Strategy 2x (LRS with SSO), by Michael Gayed and Charles Bilello, 2016 (holds SPY)
- 200-Day Moving Average Strategy (S&P 500), by Jeremy Siegel, 1994, Michael Gayed and Charles Bilello, 2016 (holds SPY)
- Golden Cross Strategy (50-day and 200-day moving averages), by Technical analysis tradition (holds SPY)
- Beta Rotation Strategy (utilities vs. the market), by Charles Bilello and Michael Gayed, 2014 (holds SPY)
- Tactical Risk Rotation (TRRS), by Michael Gayed and Charles Bilello, 2014 (holds SPY)
- Volatility-Managed Portfolio (Moreira and Muir), by Alan Moreira and Tyler Muir, 2017 (holds SPY)
- Growth-Trend Timing (Philosophical Economics’ GTT), by Jesse Livermore (Philosophical Economics), 2016 (holds SPY)
- Growth-Trend Timing with unemployment (GTT-UE), by Jesse Livermore (Philosophical Economics), 2016 (holds SPY)
- Growth-Trend Timing with job growth, by Jesse Livermore (Philosophical Economics), 2016 (holds SPY)
- Growth-Trend Timing with housing starts and income, by Jesse Livermore (Philosophical Economics), 2016 (holds SPY)
- Lethargic Asset Allocation (Keller’s LAA), by Wouter J. Keller, 2019 (holds SPY)
- TrendYCMacro (Quantpedia’s market timing strategy), by Ladislav Ďurian and Radovan Vojtko (Quantpedia), 2023 (holds SPY)
- Inflation Compass (Varadi’s growth and inflation model), by David Varadi, 2026 (holds SPY)
Other funds like IVV and SPY#
Each fund has more funds that hold the same kind of investments, ranked by how closely they move with it: IVV alternatives and SPY alternatives.
Test a mix of IVV and SPY#
Open the builder, add IVV and SPY, and give each a weight, such as 50% and 50%. The backtest shows how the mix would have done, with its worst drop, on daily prices. You can also add a rule, for example to switch between them, and compare. Read the full pages for IVV and SPY, or see more ETF comparisons.
The details#
Both funds use Tactfolio’s stored daily prices, adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They are compared only on days both traded, starting the later fund’s first day, so neither gets a head start. Correlation uses daily returns over the same days. Read what a backtest simulates for more on these measures.
Common questions#
Are IVV and SPY the same?#
They track the same index, the S&P 500, so they hold the same companies. They differ in yearly fee, in how the fund is set up, and in how much trades each day.
Why is SPY’s fee higher than IVV’s?#
SPY is the oldest US ETF and kept its trust structure and fee, while newer funds such as IVV cut fees to compete for long-term investors.
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPY?#
IVV costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.0945%. Fees come from each issuer and were checked on October 16, 2026.
Which did better, IVV or SPY?#
From May 2000 to October 2026, IVV returned about 8.6% a year and SPY returned about 8.5% a year, with dividends reinvested. Their worst drops were −55.3% and −55.2%. Past returns do not tell you what comes next.