VEA vs VWO: fees, holdings and returns

VEA holds companies in rich countries outside the US, such as Japan, the UK, Canada and much of Europe. VWO holds companies in emerging markets such as China, India, Taiwan and Brazil. They hold no stocks in common. Over the same dates since July 2007, VEA returned about 5.1% a year and VWO returned about 4.0% a year.

Written by the Tactfolio research team. Fund facts checked October 16, 2026. Prices through October 20, 2026.

VEA

Yearly fee
0.03%
about $3 on $10,000
Return per year
5.1%
since July 2007
Worst drop
−60.7%
since 2007
Started trading
Jul 2007
Vanguard

VWO

Yearly fee
0.06%
about $6 on $10,000
Return per year
4.0%
since July 2007
Worst drop
−67.7%
since 2007
Started trading
Mar 2005
Vanguard

Key points

  • VEA costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.06%.
  • VEA started trading in July 2007. VWO started in March 2005.
  • Worst drops since 2007: VEA −60.7%, VWO −67.7%.
  • Daily correlation: 0.87 (1 means they always move together).

What is the difference between VEA and VWO?#

VEA and VWO split the world outside the US in two. Emerging markets have faster-growing economies but also more political risk and bigger currency swings, and their stock markets have risen and fallen more sharply. Developed markets have tended to be steadier. When emerging markets lead, as they did in the 2000s, VWO tends to do better. Both charge low fees.

FactVEAVWO
Full nameVanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETFVanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
IssuerVanguardVanguard
Expense ratio0.03% a year0.06% a year
Started tradingJuly 20, 2007March 4, 2005
TracksFTSE Developed All Cap ex US IndexFTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index
Holdings3,903 holdings as of September 30, 20266,507 holdings as of September 30, 2026
TypeInternational stocks, ETFEmerging market stocks, ETF

Fund facts checked on the Vanguard VEA page and the Vanguard VWO page.

Is VEA or VWO cheaper?#

VEA costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.06%. On $10,000, that is about $3 a year for VEA and $6 for VWO. The fund takes its fee out of its own value a little each day, so you never get a bill.

VEA vs VWO performance over the same dates#

$5k$10k$20k2008201120142017202020232026
VEAVWOGrowth of $10,000, log scale, with dividends reinvested. Past results do not tell you what happens next.

Both funds are measured from July 2007 to October 2026, the dates both traded. VEA returned about 5.1% a year and VWO returned about 4.0% a year. VEA came out ahead over this period, which does not mean it will again.

MeasureVEAVWO
$10,000 grew to$25,956$21,163
Total return159.6%111.6%
Return per year (CAGR)5.1%4.0%
Worst drop from a high−60.7%−67.7%
Volatility (how much it swings)21.5%26.4%
Last 12 months17.0%8.3%
Last 3 years, per year21.9%18.7%
Last 5 years, per year9.3%5.3%
Last 10 years, per year9.8%7.3%

Prices through October 20, 2026. Figures use daily closing prices adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They do not include taxes or the cost of buying and selling. Past results do not tell you what will happen next.

VEA and VWO returns by year#

YearVEAVWO
2026 (part of the year)12.8%8.7%
202535.2%25.6%
20243.1%10.6%
202317.9%9.3%
2022−15.3%−18.0%
202111.7%1.3%
20209.7%15.2%
201922.6%20.8%
2018−14.8%−14.8%
201726.4%31.5%
20162.6%12.2%
2015−0.4%−15.8%
2014−6.0%0.0%
201321.8%−4.9%
201218.6%19.2%
2011−12.3%−18.8%
20108.3%19.5%
200927.5%76.3%
2008−40.6%−52.5%
2007 (part of the year)2.3%13.9%

Which fell further in bad times?#

A drawdown is how far a fund falls from its last high point. VEA’s worst fall was −60.7%, from October 31, 2007 to March 9, 2009. It got back to that high on May 27, 2014.

VWO’s worst fall was −67.7%, from October 31, 2007 to November 20, 2008. It got back to that high on September 11, 2017.

Their daily moves had a correlation of 0.87. A correlation of 1 means two funds always move up and down together. Near 0 means they move on their own. So they often move together, but not always.

Why people choose VEA or VWO#

VEA. People who want companies in rich countries outside the US tend to pick VEA.

VWO. People who want companies in faster-growing economies, and accept bigger swings, tend to pick VWO.

Strategies that hold VEA or VWO#

These classic strategies hold one or both at least some of the time. Each is a set of written rules you can open, test and copy.

Other funds like VEA and VWO#

Each fund has more funds that hold the same kind of investments, ranked by how closely they move with it: VEA alternatives and VWO alternatives.

Test a mix of VEA and VWO#

Open the builder, add VEA and VWO, and give each a weight, such as 50% and 50%. The backtest shows how the mix would have done, with its worst drop, on daily prices. You can also add a rule, for example to switch between them, and compare. Read the full pages for VEA and VWO, or see more ETF comparisons.

The details#

Both funds use Tactfolio’s stored daily prices, adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They are compared only on days both traded, starting the later fund’s first day, so neither gets a head start. Correlation uses daily returns over the same days. Read what a backtest simulates for more on these measures.

Common questions#

Do VEA and VWO overlap?#

No. VEA holds developed markets and VWO emerging markets, so together they cover the world outside the US.

Is South Korea in VEA or VWO?#

VEA. FTSE, whose indexes both funds follow, counts South Korea as a developed market.

Which is cheaper, VEA or VWO?#

VEA costs less: 0.03% a year against 0.06%. Fees come from each issuer and were checked on October 16, 2026.

Which did better, VEA or VWO?#

From July 2007 to October 2026, VEA returned about 5.1% a year and VWO returned about 4.0% a year, with dividends reinvested. Their worst drops were −60.7% and −67.7%. Past returns do not tell you what comes next.

Sources#