VHT alternatives and similar ETFs
The ETFs most like VHT are XLV, USMV and QUAL. XLV holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers, like VHT. XLV costs less: 0.08% a year against 0.09%.
Written by the Tactfolio research team. Fund facts checked October 17, 2026. Prices through October 16, 2026.
Key points
- 5 funds can stand in for VHT: 1 of the same kind and 4 related funds.
- VHT charges 0.09% a year (about $9 on $10,000). The cheapest alternative here, XLV, charges 0.08%.
- XLV moved most like VHT: a daily correlation of 0.99 over about the last five years.
- Returns and drops for each pair use the same dates for both funds.
VHT alternatives at a glance#
Each fund below can stand in for VHT, closest first. “Same kind” funds hold the same kind of stocks through a different index. “Related” funds make a different bet that often moves the same way.
| ETF | How close | Yearly fee | Fee on $10,000 | Tracks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VHT | This fund | 0.09% | $9 | MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index |
| XLV | Same kind of fund | 0.08% | $8 | Health Care Select Sector Index |
| USMV | Related fund | 0.15% | $15 | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index |
| QUAL | Related fund | 0.15% | $15 | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index |
| VDC | Related fund | 0.09% | $9 | MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index |
| XLP | Related fund | 0.08% | $8 | Consumer Staples Select Sector Index |
Fees come from each fund company, checked on the dates shown on each fund’s page.
How VHT and its alternatives did over the same dates#
Each row measures the alternative and VHT on the days both traded, so neither gets a head start. Correlation shows how closely their daily moves matched over about the last five years. A value of 1 means they always moved together.
| ETF | Moves with VHT | Per year | VHT per year | Worst drop | VHT worst drop | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLV | 0.99 | 9.8% | 10.1% | −39.2% | −39.1% | January 2004 |
| USMV | 0.80 | 11.7% | 13.8% | −33.1% | −28.8% | October 2011 |
| QUAL | 0.68 | 13.6% | 11.7% | −34.1% | −28.8% | July 2013 |
| VDC | 0.61 | 9.5% | 10.1% | −34.2% | −39.1% | January 2004 |
| XLP | 0.60 | 9.1% | 10.1% | −32.4% | −39.1% | January 2004 |
Prices through October 16, 2026. Figures use daily closing prices adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They do not include taxes or the cost of buying and selling. Past results do not tell you what will happen next.
Each VHT alternative, compared#
XLV: State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF#
XLV also holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers. It tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index, while VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index.
It charges 0.08% a year, about $8 on $10,000, against $9 for VHT. It held 61 stocks, against 412 for VHT.
From January 2004 to October 2026, XLV returned about 9.8% a year and VHT returned about 10.1% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.99).
Read the XLV fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.
USMV: iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF#
USMV is a looser match. It holds US stocks picked by rules for steady profits or smaller price swings, while VHT holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers.
It charges 0.15% a year, about $15 on $10,000, against $9 for VHT. It held 174 stocks, against 412 for VHT.
From October 2011 to October 2026, USMV returned about 11.7% a year and VHT returned about 13.8% a year. Over about the last five years they often moved together, but not always (correlation 0.80).
Read the USMV fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.
QUAL: iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF#
QUAL is a looser match. It holds US stocks picked by rules for steady profits or smaller price swings, while VHT holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers.
It charges 0.15% a year, about $15 on $10,000, against $9 for VHT. It held 118 stocks, against 412 for VHT.
From July 2013 to October 2026, QUAL returned about 13.6% a year and VHT returned about 11.7% a year. Over about the last five years they often moved together, but not always (correlation 0.68).
Read the QUAL fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.
VDC: Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF#
VDC is a looser match. It holds US companies that sell things people buy in good times and bad, such as food and soap, while VHT holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers.
It charges 0.09% a year, about $9 on $10,000, against $9 for VHT. It held 103 stocks, against 412 for VHT.
From January 2004 to October 2026, VDC returned about 9.5% a year and VHT returned about 10.1% a year. Over about the last five years they often moved together, but not always (correlation 0.61).
Read the VDC fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.
XLP: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF#
XLP is a looser match. It holds US companies that sell things people buy in good times and bad, such as food and soap, while VHT holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers.
It charges 0.08% a year, about $8 on $10,000, against $9 for VHT. It held 35 stocks, against 412 for VHT.
From January 2004 to October 2026, XLP returned about 9.1% a year and VHT returned about 10.1% a year. Over about the last five years they often moved together, but not always (correlation 0.60).
Read the XLP fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.
VHT versions from other fund companies#
Some people keep all their funds with one company. Here is the closest fund to VHT from each other company on this page:
- SPDR (State Street): XLV, State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (same kind of fund, 0.08% a year)
- iShares (BlackRock): USMV, iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (related fund, 0.15% a year)
Most brokers let you buy any ETF, whoever runs it. Mutual fund versions, such as a fund company’s index mutual fund, are not listed here.
How to choose between VHT and its alternatives#
- What it tracks. A fund on the same index holds the same stocks. A different index can mean different weights, more or fewer holdings, or a different mix.
- The fee. The difference is often small. On $10,000, VHT costs about $9 a year. XLV costs about $8.
- History. An older fund has been through more bad markets, so you can see how far it fell.
- What you already own. Two funds that move together add little variety. A fund with a low correlation behaves more on its own.
Swapping VHT to harvest a tax loss#
Some investors sell a fund at a loss to lower their taxes, then buy a similar fund so they stay invested. This is called tax-loss harvesting.
The IRS wash sale rule blocks the loss if you buy a “substantially identical” security within 30 days before or after the sale. The IRS has not said exactly when two funds count. Funds on the same index are more likely to. Funds on a different index, such as XLV, USMV or QUAL, are less likely to.
Ask a tax professional before you rely on this. Read the IRS rules in Publication 550.
Test VHT and its alternatives in a backtest#
Tactfolio is a platform where you build rules-based investing strategies, backtest them on decades of real prices, share them, and run them automatically in your own Alpaca account. Open the builder, add VHT and XLV, and see how each would have done on the same dates, or how a mix of both would have done.
The details#
Alternatives are picked from facts, not from returns. First come funds that track the same index as VHT. Then come funds that hold the same kind of stocks through another index. Last come funds from a close category that make a different bet. Leveraged funds are only listed as alternatives to other leveraged funds.
Within each group, the funds whose daily returns moved most like VHT over about the last five years come first. Returns and worst drops use Tactfolio’s stored daily prices, adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. Each alternative is measured with VHT only on days both traded. Read what a backtest simulates for more on these measures.
Common questions#
What ETF is most similar to VHT?#
XLV is the closest. XLV also holds US drug makers, medical device makers and health insurers. It tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index, while VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together.
Is there a cheaper alternative to VHT?#
Yes. XLV charges 0.08% a year and XLP charges 0.08% a year, against 0.09% for VHT. On $10,000 that is about $8 a year instead of $9.
Is VHT or XLV better?#
Neither is better for everyone. From January 2004 to October 2026, VHT returned about 10.1% a year and XLV returned about 9.8% a year. VHT charges 0.09% a year and XLV charges 0.08%. Past returns do not tell you what comes next.
What if I had put $10,000 in VHT 10 years ago?#
It would have grown to about $29,673 by October 16, 2026, with dividends reinvested. That is about 11.5% a year. Past returns do not tell you what comes next.
Sources#
- Vanguard: Vanguard Health Care ETF fund page
- SPDR (State Street): State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF fund page
- iShares (BlackRock): iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF fund page
- iShares (BlackRock): iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF fund page
- Vanguard: Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF fund page
- SPDR (State Street): State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF fund page
- IRS Publication 550: wash sales