XLK alternatives and similar ETFs

XLK alternatives at a glance#

Each fund below can stand in for XLK, closest first. “Same kind” funds hold the same kind of stocks through a different index. “Related” funds make a different bet that often moves the same way.

Fees come from each fund company, checked on the dates shown on each fund’s page.

How XLK and its alternatives did over the same dates#

Each row measures the alternative and XLK on the days both traded, so neither gets a head start. Correlation shows how closely their daily moves matched over about the last five years. A value of 1 means they always moved together.

Prices through October 16, 2026. Figures use daily closing prices adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. They do not include taxes or the cost of buying and selling. Past results do not tell you what will happen next.

Each XLK alternative, compared#

FTEC: Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF#

FTEC also holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers. It tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLK tracks the Technology Select Sector Index.

It charges 0.084% a year, about $8.40 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 282 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From October 2013 to October 2026, FTEC returned about 21.7% a year and XLK returned about 21.8% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.99).

Read the FTEC fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

VGT: Vanguard Information Technology ETF#

VGT also holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers. It tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLK tracks the Technology Select Sector Index.

It charges 0.09% a year, about $9 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 318 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From January 2004 to October 2026, VGT returned about 14.8% a year and XLK returned about 14.8% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.99).

Read the VGT fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

IYW: iShares U.S. Technology ETF#

IYW also holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers. It tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while XLK tracks the Technology Select Sector Index.

It charges 0.37% a year, about $37 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 148 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From May 2000 to October 2026, IYW returned about 9.4% a year and XLK returned about 9.2% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.98).

Read the IYW fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

QQQM: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF#

QQQM is a looser match. It holds the 100 biggest companies on the Nasdaq outside finance, many of them in technology, while XLK holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers.

It charges 0.15% a year, about $15 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK.

From October 2020 to October 2026, QQQM returned about 16.5% a year and XLK returned about 20.9% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.97).

Read the QQQM fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

QQQ: Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1#

QQQ is a looser match. It holds the 100 biggest companies on the Nasdaq outside finance, many of them in technology, while XLK holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers.

It charges 0.18% a year, about $18 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK.

From March 1999 to October 2026, QQQ returned about 10.7% a year and XLK returned about 10.0% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.97).

Read the QQQ fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

ONEQ: Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF#

ONEQ is a looser match. It holds the 100 biggest companies on the Nasdaq outside finance, many of them in technology, while XLK holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers.

It charges 0.21% a year, about $21 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 1,032 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From October 2003 to October 2026, ONEQ returned about 13.2% a year and XLK returned about 15.3% a year. Over about the last five years they moved almost exactly together (correlation 0.95).

Read the ONEQ fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

SOXX: iShares Semiconductor ETF#

SOXX is a looser match. It holds companies that design and make computer chips, while XLK holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers.

It charges 0.33% a year, about $33 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 30 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From July 2001 to October 2026, SOXX returned about 13.6% a year and XLK returned about 12.1% a year. Over about the last five years they moved together on most days (correlation 0.91).

Read the SOXX fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

QQEW: First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF#

QQEW is a looser match. It holds the 100 biggest companies on the Nasdaq outside finance, many of them in technology, while XLK holds US technology companies, such as makers of chips, software and computers.

It charges 0.55% a year, about $55 on $10,000, against $8 for XLK. It held 50 stocks, against 75 for XLK.

From May 2006 to October 2026, QQEW returned about 11.2% a year and XLK returned about 16.3% a year. Over about the last five years they moved together on most days (correlation 0.90).

Read the QQEW fund page for its returns by year and worst drop.

XLK versions from other fund companies#

Some people keep all their funds with one company. Here is the closest fund to XLK from each other company on this page:

• Fidelity: FTEC, Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (same kind of fund, 0.084% a year)
• Vanguard: VGT, Vanguard Information Technology ETF (same kind of fund, 0.09% a year)
• iShares (BlackRock): IYW, iShares U.S. Technology ETF (same kind of fund, 0.37% a year)
• Invesco: QQQM, Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (related fund, 0.15% a year)
• First Trust: QQEW, First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (related fund, 0.55% a year)

Most brokers let you buy any ETF, whoever runs it. Mutual fund versions, such as a fund company’s index mutual fund, are not listed here.

How to choose between XLK and its alternatives#

• What it tracks. A fund on the same index holds the same stocks. A different index can mean different weights, more or fewer holdings, or a different mix.
• The fee. The difference is often small. On $10,000, XLK costs about $8 a year.
• History. An older fund has been through more bad markets, so you can see how far it fell.
• What you already own. Two funds that move together add little variety. A fund with a low correlation behaves more on its own.

Swapping XLK to harvest a tax loss#

Some investors sell a fund at a loss to lower their taxes, then buy a similar fund so they stay invested. This is called tax-loss harvesting.

The IRS wash sale rule blocks the loss if you buy a “substantially identical” security within 30 days before or after the sale. The IRS has not said exactly when two funds count. Funds on the same index are more likely to. Funds on a different index, such as FTEC, VGT or IYW, are less likely to.

Ask a tax professional before you rely on this. Read the IRS rules in Publication 550.

Test XLK and its alternatives in a backtest#

Tactfolio is a platform where you build rules-based investing strategies, backtest them on decades of real prices, share them, and run them automatically in your own Alpaca account. Open the builder, add XLK and FTEC, and see how each would have done on the same dates, or how a mix of both would have done.

The details#

Alternatives are picked from facts, not from returns. First come funds that track the same index as XLK. Then come funds that hold the same kind of stocks through another index. Last come funds from a close category that make a different bet. Leveraged funds are only listed as alternatives to other leveraged funds.

Within each group, the funds whose daily returns moved most like XLK over about the last five years come first. Returns and worst drops use Tactfolio’s stored daily prices, adjusted for splits, with dividends reinvested. Each alternative is measured with XLK only on days both traded. Read what a backtest simulates for more on these measures.